Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 09:46

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why does my mom never wear underwear?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What Is Agentic AI? Everything to Know About Artificial Intelligence Agents - CNET
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Million-Dollar Project Aims to Expose Bad Medical Research - Gizmodo
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
This Google experimental app lets you run powerful AI models without Wi-Fi - Android Police
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) Reports Strong Q1, Stock Jumps 14.3% - Yahoo Finance
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Shortcuts App to Get Revamp With Apple Intelligence Integration - MacRumors
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
If Humans Become Extinct, This Is the Species That Will Take Over the Planet - The Daily Galaxy
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.